House Bill 799 (Public) Filed Monday, April 7, 2025
AN ACT TO ENSURE NONDISCRIMINATION AND DIGNITY IN GOVERNMENT HIRING, PROMOTION, TRAINING, AND WORKPLACES.
Intro. by Echevarria, Setzer, Gable.
House Bill 799, introduced in the North Carolina House of Representatives, protects public employees and job applicants from being required to profess or affirm certain political, social, or ideological views. It reinforces equal opportunity in state and local government hiring, promotions, and training.
Passed First Reading: April 8, 2025
Current Status as of April 19, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations for further consideration.
✅ Thank the sponsors:
Send a quick email to let them know you appreciate their leadership:
Contact Your Representatives: Reach out to Representatives Ager, Prather, and Turner to share your support for SB 474 and inquire about their positions on the bill.
Buncombe County House Representatives:
Buncombe County is represented by three Democratic members in the North Carolina House:
Representative Eric Ager (District 114)
📧 Eric.Ager@ncleg.gov | (919) 715-2013
Representative Lindsey Prather (District 115)
📧 Lindsey.Prather@ncleg.gov | (919) 733-5746
Representative Brian Turner (District 116)
📧 Brian.Turner@ncleg.gov | (919) 715-3012
While these representatives are Democrats, engaging with them to express your views on SB 799 may influence their stance on the bill.
Ask them:
“Do you support HB 799, and will you vote to protect free thought and fairness in government hiring? If not, why?”
Let us know what they say.
Sample eMail message below. Feel free to copy this one or write your own:
Subject: Protect Free Thought in Public Employment
Dear Representative [Last Name],
I am writing as your constituent to respectfully urge you to support House Bill 799, which was filed on April 7, 2025, and passed its first reading the next day. The bill is currently awaiting action in the House Rules, Calendar, and Operations Committee.
HB 799 is a critical step toward ensuring that North Carolina’s public hiring and training policies remain fair, transparent, and free from ideological coercion. No job applicant or public employee should be forced to adopt or affirm political or social beliefs in order to qualify for a job, promotion, or training opportunity.
This legislation reinforces non-discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or sex and makes it clear that belief in controversial or divisive concepts cannot be a condition of public employment. It also protects constitutionally guaranteed free speech and academic freedom while preventing taxpayer dollars from funding ideologically biased training programs.
I would appreciate knowing where you stand on this important bill. Do you support HB 799? If not, could you please explain your concerns?
Thank you for your service to our district and for your attention to this issue. I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Street Address or City, ZIP (optional but helpful)]
[Your Email Address]
[Your Phone Number (optional)]
Public Engagement: Consider writing letters to local newspapers or participating in community forums to raise awareness about the bill's importance.
Sample Letter to Editor below. Feel free to copy this one or write your own:
Subject: HB 799 Protects Fairness and Free Thought in Government Hiring
To the Editor,
North Carolina House Bill 799 deserves the attention and support of every citizen who values fairness, inclusion, and the right to think freely.
This bill, filed earlier this month, reinforces a basic principle: no one should be forced to profess political or ideological beliefs to qualify for a job or keep one. HB 799 would make sure hiring and training decisions in state and local government are based on qualifications—not on whether someone agrees with a controversial theory or ideology.
It doesn’t eliminate diversity initiatives or ban education about history or culture. It simply says that participation in such programs must be voluntary—and that public employees shouldn’t be punished for holding different views. It also prevents tax dollars from being used to promote one-sided ideological content in required employee training.
In a community like ours that often prides itself on openness and tolerance, I hope we can agree that those values should extend to government workplaces, too.
I encourage readers to thank the bill’s sponsors and ask Representatives Ager, Prather, and Turner whether they plan to support HB 799—and why or why not.
Fairness and freedom of thought shouldn't be partisan. They should be expected.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Town or ZIP Code]
[Optional: Email Address or Phone Number]
Here’s a strategic list of likely opposition arguments you may hear from left-leaning critics about HB 799 (NONDISCRIMINATION AND DIGNITY IN GOVERNMENT)—paired with moderate/conservative responses to help you defend these bills in public forums, letters, and social media.
✅ Response:
HB 799 doesn’t eliminate DEI programs—it ensures they’re voluntary, not coercive. It protects employees from being forced to adopt controversial beliefs as a condition of employment or promotion. In fact, this bill upholds the very principle of inclusion by making sure government workplaces welcome diverse viewpoints—not just those aligned with one ideology.
✅ Response:
That’s false. HB 799 explicitly protects academic instruction and constitutionally protected speech. It targets mandatory belief in specific ideological concepts—not education or discussion. Teachers can still teach history. But public employers shouldn’t tell employees what to believe about it.
✅ Response:
Ask public employees—there is a problem. Workers in state and local government have been subjected to training that labels dissent as racism or bias. HB 799 protects whistleblowers, job applicants, and employees from being silenced or punished for disagreeing. This is about restoring professionalism and trust in government institutions.
✅ Response:
HB 799 prohibits discrimination based on race, sex, ethnicity, and religion. It expands civil rights protections—not weakens them. It just says you can’t force someone to affirm a belief—even in the name of equity. That’s not protecting bigotry. It’s protecting basic American values of freedom of conscience.
✅ Response:
Not at all. The bill doesn’t ban conversations—it ensures they’re not mandated, politicized, or one-sided. Real dialogue requires voluntary participation, not ideological enforcement. HB 799 creates space for everyone to engage—without fear of retaliation or being labeled for thinking differently.
Whenever possible, return to first principles that resonate with moderates:
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.