Buncombe County Health & Human Services (HHS) Board
🔍 Why Monitor the HHS Board?
- Broad Oversight Responsibilities: The HHS Board oversees a wide range of programs, including public health, social services, economic assistance, and veterans services. Their decisions directly impact the well-being of Buncombe County residents. Buncombe County
- Significant Budgetary Authority: The board influences substantial portions of the county's budget, directing funds to various health and human services programs. Monitoring their allocations can provide insights into the county's priorities.
- Community Impact: Decisions made by the HHS Board affect vulnerable populations, including low-income families, the elderly, and veterans. Ensuring their actions align with community needs is crucial.
- Transparency and Accountability: Regular monitoring can promote transparency, ensuring that the board operates in the public's best interest and adheres to ethical standards.
📝 Action Steps for the DoGE Team
- Attend Meetings: The HHS Board meets regularly. Attending these meetings can provide firsthand insights into their discussions and decisions.
- Review Meeting Materials: Analyzing agendas, minutes, and financial reports can help identify key issues and trends.
- Engage with Board Members: Building relationships with board members can facilitate open communication and provide opportunities to voice community concerns.
- Report Findings: Sharing observations and analyses with the broader community can raise awareness and encourage civic participation.
🔍 Areas Identified for Ongoing Monitoring
1. Board Appointment Transparency & Ideological Balance
- Verify appointment processes: Are candidates being publicly recruited and appointed through open calls, or are appointments politically insulated?
- Evaluate political diversity: Currently, the board is dominated by Democratic or left-leaning Unaffiliated members, with only one known Republican. Does this reflect the full diversity of county viewpoints?
- Double-duty concern: Jennifer Horton appears to hold two distinct roles—as County Commissioner and Registered Nurse—which may undercut the intent of NC law requiring multiple distinct professionals.
- Vacancy management: Several seats (Social Worker, Engineer, 4+ Consumer Advocates) remain vacant. Is the County Commission actively seeking to fill these roles, or are vacancies being left unfilled due to lack of outreach or political preference?
2. Funding Prioritization & Budget Scrutiny
- Animal vs. Veterans Services: Animal Services received nearly 4× the funding of Veterans Services in FY25 ($1.7M vs. $449K). What’s the justification?
- Transparency in allocation decisions: Are spending decisions discussed in open meetings with rationale provided? Is public input invited on funding priorities?
- Monitoring emergency/disaster funds: How are Tropical Storm Helene-related recovery dollars being prioritized across programs (e.g., public health, energy assistance, housing, case management)?
- Grant oversight: Are grants (like those from Vaya Health or Dogwood Health Trust) being aligned with publicly approved goals? Who evaluates their effectiveness?
3. Public Records Compliance & Meeting Transparency
- Delayed or missing meeting minutes: Minutes for some meetings have been late (e.g., March 28 and May 23, 2025). Meeting attachments (e.g., HB 197 letter) have also been missing despite being referenced in official records.
- Video/audio recordings: May 23, 2025 agenda states the meeting was recorded — yet no recording is publicly posted. Was it recorded? Where is it?
- Document labeling and web access issues: May 23 materials were mislabeled as “March” on the county website, creating public confusion and hindering access to accurate documentation.
- Board Roster accuracy: The public-facing board member list is outdated or incorrect. How often is it audited and updated?
4. Oversight of Economic Services / Public Assistance Programs
- HHS Board has statutory oversight over Economic Services, including:
- Medicaid, Food & Nutrition, Energy Assistance, Special Assistance, and Work First Family Assistance
- Medicaid, Food & Nutrition, Energy Assistance, Special Assistance, and Work First Family Assistance
- Evaluate program performance: Is the board asking tough questions about program effectiveness, duplication, and equity in delivery?
- Monitor dependency on federal/state funds: Many programs rely on outside dollars. Is the board tracking program sustainability in light of funding cuts?
- Assess service gaps: Are certain populations (e.g., veterans, working poor, rural households) underserved by current programs?
- Analyze overlaps with other departments or nonprofits: Is the board evaluating redundancies or opportunities for consolidation?
Newsletter Signup
You’re not alone in wanting a better direction for our community.
We’ll help you get informed, find ways to get involved, and meet others who are working to bring fairness and common sense back to local decision-making.